Cytotoxicity testing is a critical step in ISO 10993 biocompatibility assessments, helping medtech leaders ensure device safety, manage regulatory risk, and select the most suitable method - qualitative, quantitative, or agar overlay - based on device type, patient contact, and…

ISO 10993-12:2021 is a critical but often overlooked standard that defines how medical devices must be prepared and extracted before biocompatibility testing. Proper sample preparation ensures accurate, clinically relevant results and prevents regulatory setbacks caused by false positives, missed risks,…

A personal reflection on how biological evaluation shaped the author’s life, from life-saving but imperfect neonatal blood bags to growth-hormone therapies and early medical devices, and how these experiences now inform a human-centred approach to designing safer, smarter medical technologies…

Over-extraction in medical device testing often produces results that don’t reflect real clinical use, leading to misleading toxicological profiles, credibility risks, and regulatory delays. By applying clinically relevant extraction methods, reducing measurement uncertainty, and aligning with regulatory expectations, medtech companies…

ISO 10993 and ISO 18562 are complementary biocompatibility standards used to evaluate medical device safety. ISO 10993 focuses on biological risks from materials in contact with tissue, while ISO 18562 addresses inhalation risks from devices delivering breathing gases. Knowing which…

Medical device lifecycle testing is essential for regulatory approval, especially for reusable instruments subject to repeated sterilisation. Benchtop autoclaves, when combined with sensors and dataloggers, can speed up testing cycles and improve data accuracy, helping smaller labs deliver rapid, reliable…

Integrated electronic traceability is transforming medical device reprocessing by unifying fragmented systems into a single, data-driven ecosystem. This shift enables real-time visibility, improved patient safety, operational efficiency, and measurable sustainability across healthcare workflows.

Reusable medical devices face increased regulatory scrutiny under MDR and FDA expectations, with reprocessing now requiring clear, defensible evidence. Common failures occur in cleaning validation, disinfection efficacy, sterilisation justification, service life testing, and post-reprocessing biocompatibility. Strong validation programmes start with…

Retesting is costly and avoidable. This article breaks down the 10 most common IFU mistakes that trigger rework, and how to fix them early.

Quality testing in medical devices ensures safety, compliance, and performance from concept to market. By verifying material integrity, chemical safety, and mechanical strength, it prevents failures and builds confidence in device reliability. It’s a strategic investment that protects patients, reputation,…

Material compatibility testing ensures medical devices maintain safety and performance throughout cleaning, sterilisation, and use. It helps manufacturers choose appropriate materials and reprocessing methods.

Mechanical degradation caused by repeated medical device reprocessing can lead to fatigue, cracking, surface wear, and loss of function. Understanding these risks, and validating durability through service-life testing is essential for safe reuse and regulatory compliance.

Incompatibility between disinfectants and device materials results in equipment damage and higher HAI rates. Understanding and addressing root causes is essential.

Medical device and IVD safety relies on IEC 60601-1 and IEC 61010-1 standards. Understanding MOPP, MOOP and clearances is critical for risk management and regulatory compliance. These standards guide manufacturers in delivering safe, compliant and reliable products.

While Good Laboratory Practice principles were originally intended for non-clinical studies in the chemical and pharmaceutical sectors, their scope has expanded to other industries, such as medical devices.

This course is specifically designed for medical device manufacturers seeking to enhance their understanding of laboratory processes and regulatory requirements for medical devices.